/ instituut voor de Nederlandse taal / Taalportaal
bibliography glossary about
  • Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Saterfrisian
  • Afrikaans
Show all
    2.3.1.General introduction
    quickinfo

    This section briefly discusses some general properties of PO-verbs and their prepositional objects. Before we start, it should be noted that many scholars have tried to give waterproof diagnostic criteria for deciding whether or not we are dealing with a prepositional object, whereas so far the general feeling is that all attempts have failed. The discussion in this section will also leave room for doubt, but we hope that the reader will nevertheless get some idea of the properties of PP-complements.

    readmore
    [+]  I.  The verb and the preposition form a semantic unit

    The one thing that all researchers seem to agree on is that the verb and the preposition that heads the PP-complement form a semantic unit, that is, express a lexically determined meaning; the meaning of the prepositions in isolation is lost. For example, the functional prepositions op and voor in the primeless examples in (295) do not have the locational meanings of the prepositions op and voor in the primed examples.

    295
    a. Jan wacht op zijn vader.
    PP-complement
      Jan waits  for  his father
    a'. Jan wacht op het perron.
    adverbial PP
      Jan waits  on  the platform
    b. Jan vecht/ijvert voor een betere wereld.
    PP-complement
      Jan fights/agitates  for  a better world
    b'. Jan vecht/*ijvert voor de school.
    adverbial PP
      Jan fights/agitates  in.front.of  the school

    The meaning of the verbs may also be bleached: whereas the verb vechten'to fight' in (295b') implies that the agent is physically involved in the activity of fighting, this is not the most prominent interpretation of the verb vechten in (295b), which may just indicate that Jan is actively involved in some activity that aims at creating a better world. This ambiguity in verbs like vechten means that in some cases it is not immediately clear whether we are dealing with a PP-complement or a PP with some other function. In example (296), for instance, the verb vechten may be used with the bleached, "metaphorical" meaning that we also find in (295b) or with the more "literal" reading in (295b'); in the former case, the PP may function as a PP-complement and in the latter as an adverbial purpose phrase of the type that we also find in Ze spaart voor een auto'She is saving money for a car'.

    296
    Jan vecht voor zijn leven.
      Jan fights  for his life
    'Jan is fighting for his life'

    Another case, taken from Schermer-Vermeer (2006), is given in (297). Example (297a) involves an adverbial comitative met-PP, as is clear from the fact that this example alternates with (297a'); cf. Section 3.4. In example (297b), on the other hand, the meaning of the verb has bleached and we may therefore be dealing with a PP-complement; a potential argument in favor of this is that this example no longer allows the alternation that we find in the (a)-examples.

    297
    a. Jan worstelt met zijn buurman.
      Jan wrestles  with his neighbor
      'Jan is wrestling with his neighbor.'
    a'. Jan en zijn buurman worstelen.
      Jan and his neighbor  wrestle
    b. Jan worstelt met zijn computer/geweten.
      Jan wrestles  with his computer/conscience
      'Jan is having difficulties with his computer/conscience.'
    b'. * Jan en zijn computer/geweten worstelen.
      Jan and his computer/conscience  wrestle

    The examples above show that the dividing line between PP-complements and PPs with some other functions is diffuse. This may be due to the fact that the V + P collocation may be a lexicalized form of an otherwise productive grammatical pattern, as a result of semantic bleaching. Consequently, it may sometimes be hard to use semantic criteria as evidence for one position or another; the decision will then have to be made by appealing to a larger number of properties of the construction as a whole.
          Since the verb and the preposition form a semantic unit, it has been suggested that in order to speak of a PP-complement, the PP must be obligatorily present. This criterion, however, would imply that the PP op zijn vader in (295a) is not a complement of the verb wachten, despite the fact that this example is often given as the prototypical case of a PP-complement. It may be feasible, however, to claim that PPs that cannot be omitted (without affecting the idiosyncratic meaning of the verb + P collocation) do involve a PP-complement; the fact that the PPs in (298) cannot be dropped can then be considered sufficient for concluding that we are dealing with PP-complements in these cases.

    298
    a. Jan vertrouwt *(op zijn geluk).
      Jan relies    on his luck
    b. Jan rekent #(op zijn geluk).
      Jan relies     on his luck
    [+]  II.  A PP-complement cannot be replaced by adverbial pro-forms

    The examples in (295) show that clauses with a PP-complement and clauses with an adverbial PP may look very similar on the surface. The two cases can often be distinguished by replacing the PP by adverbial pro-forms like daar'there' and hier'here'. If we are dealing with an adverbial PP of place, this is normally possible, but not if we are dealing with a PP-complement: daar in (299a) corresponds to the adverbial PP in (295a'), but not to the PP-complement in (295a); similarly, daar in (299b) corresponds to the adverbial PP in (295b'), but not to the PP-complement in (295b).

    299
    a. Jan wacht daar.
      Jan waits  there
    b. Jan vecht daar.
      Jan fights  there

    The fact that a PP-complement cannot be replaced by an adverb like daar or hier need not surprise us, since this would result in the loss of the preposition, which forms a semantic unit with the verb. That it is indeed the loss of the preposition that causes the problem in the case of PP-complements is clear from the fact that R-pronominalization, which retains the preposition, is possible with PP-complements. This is shown by the fact that the pronominal PPs in (300) are typically interpreted as PP-complements.

    300
    a. Jan wacht daarop.
      Jan waits  for.that
    b. Jan ijvert daarvoor.
      Jan fights  for.that

    The possibility of R-pronominalization is not sufficient, however, for concluding that we are dealing with a PP-complement: pronominal PPs like daarvoor/daarop can also be used as adverbial phrases, including locational ones. This test can therefore not be used to distinguish the (a)-examples and (b)-examples in (297) from Subsection I.

    [+]  III.  The preposition has no or a restricted paradigm

    Since the verb and preposition form a semantic unit, the preposition of a PP-complement normally cannot be replaced by some other preposition, in contrast to what is the case with adverbially used PPs of place or time. Some examples are given in (301).

    301
    a. Jan wacht op/#bij/#naast zijn vader.
    PP-complement
      Jan waits  for/near/next.to  his father
    a'. Jan wacht op/bij/naast het perron.
    adverbial PP
      Jan waits  on/near/next.to  the platform
    b. Jan ijvert/vecht voor/*bij/*achter een betere wereld.
    PP-complement
      Jan fights/fights  for/near/behind  a better world
    b'. Jan vecht voor/bij/achter de school.
    adverbial PP
      Jan fights  in.front.of/near/behind  the school

    This does not, however, provide a foolproof test for determining whether we are dealing with a PP-complement. A first complication is that non-locational and non-temporal adverbial PPs also have a restricted paradigm; the preposition met in comitative PPs like met zijn buurman'with his neighbor' in (297a), for instance, cannot be replaced by any other preposition either (with the possible exception of zonder'without'), which means that this test cannot be used to distinguish the (a)- and (b)-examples in (297).
          A second complication is that certain verbs can select different PP-complements. In some cases, like the (a)- and (b)-examples in (302), the choice of the preposition hardly affects the meaning of the verbs.

    302
    a. Els gelooft vooral in zichzelf.
      Els believes  especially  in herself
    a'. Els gelooft aan spiritisme.
      Els believes  in spiritualism
    b. Jan denkt aan/om zijn moeder.
      Jan thinks  about/about  his mother
    b'. Jan denkt over een nieuwe baan.
      Jan thinks  about  a new job

    Less problematic are those cases in which a different choice of preposition goes hand-in-hand with a different meaning: for cases such as jagen op in (303a), which is construed literally as "to hunt", and jagen naar in (303b), which is interpreted metaphorically with the meaning "to seek", we may assume that we are dealing with two separate lexical entries.

    303
    a. Peter jaagt op herten.
      Peter hunts  at deer
      'Peter is hunting deer.'
    b. Peter jaagt naar succes.
      Peter hunts  after success
      'Peter seeks success.'

    Table 8 presents a small sample of PO-verbs that are compatible with more than one preposition. Note that with these verbs the paradigms of the prepositions are still very limited; usage of any other preposition with these verbs will give rise to an unacceptable result or to an adverbial reading of the PP.

    Table 8: PO-Verbs compatible with more than one preposition
    preposition verb translation
    aan, met beginnen aan/met to start/to begin with
    aan, om,over
    aan, over    		 denken aan/om/over
    twijfelen aan/over    		 to think about/to mind/to think of
    to doubt about/about
    aan, in geloven aan/in to believe in
    bij, tot behoren bij/tot to rank among/to belong to
    naar, op
    naar, tot
    naar, om    		 jagen naar/op
    leiden naar/tot
    vragen naar/om    		 to seek/to hunt after
    to lead to/to end in
    to inquire after/to ask for
    om, van
    om, over
    om, over, voor    		 huilen om/van
    treuren om/over
    vechten om/voor/over    		 to cry over/to cry with
    to mourn for/over
    to fight for/for/over
    over, van spreken over/van
    horen over/van    		 to mention/to speak of
    to hear about/of
    van, uit bevrijden van/uit
    redden van/uit    		 to rescue from/to deliver from
    to save from

    [+]  IV.  A PP-complement cannot be modified

    Given that the verb and the preposition of the PP-complement form a semantic unit, they differ from adverbial PPs in that they cannot be independently modified. This is illustrated in (304); the fact that the voor-PP in (304b) can be modified by the adverbial modifier vlak'just' is sufficient to show that this PP is an adverbial phrase.

    304
    a. * Jan vecht/ijvert vlak voor een betere wereld.
    PP-complement
      Jan fights/agitates  just  for a better world
    b. Jan vecht vlak voor de school.
    adverbial PP
      Jan fights  just  in.front.of the school

    Modification is a typical property of locational and temporal PPs–most other adverbial PPs do not have this property; see Section P3.3 for a small number of exceptions. This means that the inability of a PP to be modified is not sufficient to conclude that we are dealing with a PP-complement.

    [+]  V.  R-extraction

    So far, we have focused on the fact that the verb and the preposition heading the PP-complement form a semantic unit. It is therefore useful to stress that the verb and the preposition do not form a syntactic unit. In other words, it is not the case that the verb and the preposition have the behavior of a complex (transitive) verb. This is clear from the fact illustrated in the (a)-examples in (305) that the complement of the preposition op, unlike the object zijn vader of a transitive verb like kussen'to kiss' in (305b), cannot be topicalized in isolation and is thus unable to strand the preposition.

    305
    a. # Zijn vaderi heeft hij [PP op ti] gewacht.
      his father  has  he  for  waited
    a'. [PP Op zijn vader]i heeft hij ti gewacht.
      for his father  has  he  waited
    b. Zijn vader heeft hij ti gekust.
      his father  has  he  kissed

    Note that the string Zijn vader heeft hij opgewacht in (305a) is acceptable if opgewacht is construed as the participle of the particle verb opwachten'to wait for/lie in wait for', hence the use of the number sign. Another complicating fact is that some speakers do accept the string in (305a) on its intended meaning. It has been suggested that these speakers construe the example as in (306); in other words, these speakers allow deletion of the R-word part of pronominal PPs; see Section P5.3 for further discussion.

    306
    Zijn vaderi daari heeft hij [PP opti] gewacht.
      his father  there  has  he  for  waited

          Although topicalization of the complement of the preposition is not possible, the formation of pronominal PPs and R-extraction are. This is shown in (307).

    307
    a. dat Jan daar al tijden op wacht.
      that  Jan there  already  ages  for waits
      'that Jan has been waiting for that for ages.'
    b. dat Jan daar al jaren voor ijvert.
      that  Jan there  already  years  for  fights
      'that Jan has been fighting for that for years.'

    The possibility of R-extraction is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for assuming that a certain PP is a complement. That it is not sufficient is clear from the fact that certain adverbial phrases, such as the instrumental met-PP in (308a), and PPs used as complementives, like op het bed in (308b), also allow R-extraction.

    308
    a. dat Jan de vloer met een oude doek schoon maakt.
      that  Jan the floor  with an old cloth  clean  makes
      'that Jan is cleaning the floor with an old cloth.'
    a'. dat Jan daar de vloer mee schoon maakt.
      that  Jan there  the floor  with  clean  makes
      'that Jan is cleaning the floor with that.'
    b. dat Jan de lakens op het bed legt.
      that  Jan the sheets  on the bed  puts
      'that Jan is putting the sheets on the bed.'
    b'. dat Jan daar de lakens op legt.
      that  Jan there  the sheets  on  puts
      'that Jan is putting the sheets on that.'

    Comitative PPs like met de buurman in (297a) do not readily allow R-extraction given that they involve a +human noun phrase; R-pronominalization and R-extraction are normally only accepted in relative clauses such as (309a); see Section P5.1. The fact that (309b) can only be construed as involving an inanimate theme can therefore not be used as an argument for claiming that the two PPs in (297a) and (297b) have a different syntactic status.

    309
    a. de man [waar Jan mee worstelt]
      the man   where  Jan with  wrestles
      'the man with whom Jan is wrestling'
    b. dat Jan er al een tijdje mee worstelt.
      that  Jan there  already  a while  with  wrestles
      'that Jan is wrestling with it/*him for a while.'
    [+]  VI.  Anticipatory pronominal PP-complements

    Consider the examples in (310), in which the PP-complement has undergone R-pronominalization. The R-word er in these examples has a function similar to that of the anticipatory pronoun het'it' in examples like dat Jan het al weet dat Peter ziek is'that Jan already knows it that Peter is ill', which is used to introduce the direct object clause dat Peter ziek is; like het the form er functions as an anticipatory pronoun introducing a dependent clause.

    310
    a. dat Jan er op wacht dat Peter zijn excuses aanbiedt.
      that  Jan there  for  waits  that  Peter his apologies  prt.-offers
    b. dat de socialisten er voor ijveren dat de wereld beter wordt.
      that  the socialists  there  for  fight  that  the world  better  becomes

    Although not all PP-complements can be used as anticipatory phrases, the possibility of such a use seems a sufficient condition for assuming complement status; adverbial phrases are never used in this way. The anticipatory PPs in the examples in (311) can only be interpreted as PP-complements, not as adverbial phrases.

    311
    a. Jan wacht er op dat zijn vader thuis komt.
      Jan waits  there  for  that  his father  home  comes
      'Jan is waiting for his father to come home.'
    b. Jan vecht/ijvert er voor dat de wereld beter wordt.
      Jan fights/agitates  there  for  that  the world  better  becomes
      'Jan is striving for the world to become a better place.'

    If anticipatory pronominal PPs are indeed necessarily PP-complements, example (312) shows that the collocation worstelen met sometimes must be analyzed as involving a PP-complement; this strongly favors our earlier claim that (297b) involves a PO-verb.

    312
    Jan worstelt er mee dat zijn vrouw hem verlaten heeft.
      Jan wrestles there  with  that  his wife  him  left  has
    'Jan is having difficulties with the fact that his wife has left him.'

          A complicating factor that must be mentioned here is that in many cases the anticipatory pronominal PP can be omitted; a clear example of this phenomenon is given in (313a). In some cases, such as (313b), speakers seem to differ in their judgments on the omissability of the pronominal PP. Example (313c) illustrates that omitting the pronominal PP is not always possible.

    313
    a. Jan klaagt (erover) dat Marie hem steeds plaagt.
      Jan complains   about.it  that  Marie him  always  teases
      'Jan complains (about it) that Marie always teases him.'
    b. Wij twijfelen %(eraan) of het huis ooit afgebouwd wordt.
      we  doubt     of.it  whether  the house  ever  prt.-finished  is
      'We doubt whether the house will ever be finished.'
    c. Jan berust *(erin) dat Marie komt.
      Jan resigns     on.it  that  Marie  comes
      'Jan resigns himself to the fact that Marie will come.'

    In fact, examples (314a&b) show that pronominal PPs must be dropped in the nominalized counterparts of the examples in (313a&b). The fact illustrated in (314c) that example (313c) cannot be nominalized can probably attributed to the fact that the pronominal PP cannot be dropped because nominalization is possible if the noun takes a regular PP: zijn berusting in haar komst'his being resigned to her coming'.

    314
    a. Jans klacht (*erover) dat Marie hem steeds plaagt
      Janʼs complaint    about.it  that  Marie him  always  teases
      'Janʼs complaint that Marie always teases him.'
    b. onze twijfel (*eraan) of het huis ooit afgebouwd wordt
      our  doubt     of.it  whether  the house  ever  prt.-finished  is
      'our doubt whether the house will ever be finished'
    c. Jans berusting *(??erin) dat Marie komt
      Janʼs resignation        on.it  that  Marie  comes

    The fact that the PP can be dropped may be somewhat surprising given that the verb and the preposition form a semantic unit. However, there is reason for assuming that the PP is still syntactically present when it is not pronounced. To see this first consider the examples in (315), which show that the anticipatory pronoun het'it' blocks topicalization of clausal objects: (315b) is only acceptable if the pronoun is dropped.

    315
    a. Jan vertelde het [dat Peter ziek is].
      Jan told  it   that  Peter ill  is
      'Jan told it that Peter is ill.'
    b. [dat Peter ziek is] vertelde Jan (*het).

    The examples in (316) show that the presence of an anticipatory pronominal PP likewise blocks topicalization of the clauses in (313a&b). In this case, however, omission of the anticipatory pronominal PP does not improve the result; cf. Vandeweghe & Devos (2003). This may be taken as evidence for the claim that it is still syntactically present.

    316
    a. * [dat Marie hem steeds plaagt] klaagt Jan (er over).
      that  Marie him  always  teases  complains  Jan about.it
      'Jan complains (about it) that Marie always teases him.'
    b. * [dat hij ongelijk had] overtuigde Jan Peter (ervan).
      that  he  wrong  had convinced  Jan Peter of it

    In (317), we give a small sample of PO-verbs that may combine with a (finite or infinitival) dependent clause, and we indicate whether or not the anticipatory PP can be dropped in that case. The judgments given are our own; it may be the case that other speakers have slightly different judgments. It is not clear to us what factors determine whether the pronominal PP must be overtly realized or can be dropped.

    317
    a. PO-verbs with an obligatory anticipatory pronominal PP: aandringen op'to insist', iemand belasten met'to make someone responsible for', berusten in'to resign oneself to', iemand complementeren met'to complement someone on', zich ergeren aan'to be annoyed at', iemand feliciteren met'to congratulate someone with', genieten van'to enjoy', iemand herinneren aan'to remind someone of', houden van'to like', rekenenop'to count on', vertrouwen op'to rely on', zich verbazen over'to wonder at', zich verwonderen over'to be amazed at', wachten op'to wait for'PO-verbs with an obligatory anticipatory pronominal PP: aandringen op'to insist', iemand belasten met'to make someone responsible for', berusten in'to resign oneself to', iemand complementeren met'to complement someone on', zich ergeren aan'to be annoyed at', iemand feliciteren met'to congratulate someone with', genieten van'to enjoy', iemand herinneren aan'to remind someone of', houden van'to like', rekenen op'to count on', vertrouwen op'to rely on', zich verbazen over'to wonder at', zich verwonderen over'to be amazed at', wachten op'to wait for'
    b. PO-verbs with an optional anticipatory pronominal PP: iemand aansporen tot'to urge someone on', zich beklagen over'to complain about', iemand beschuldigen van'to accuse someone of', informeren naar'to inquire about', iemand inlichten over'to inform someone about', klagen over'to complain about', oppassen voor'to look out for', iemand opwekken tot'to urge someone on to', iemand overhalen tot'to persuade someone to', iemand overtuigen van'to convince someone of', zich schamen over'to be ashamed of', twijfelen aan/over'to doubt of/to be in doubt about', uitkijken voor'to watch out for', waarschuwen voor'to warn against', zaniken/zeuren over'to nag about', zorgen voor'to look after'PO-verbs with an optional anticipatory pronominal PP: iemand aansporen tot'to urge someone on', zich beklagen over'to complain about', iemand beschuldigen van'to accuse someone of', informeren naar'to inquire about', iemand inlichten over'to inform someone about', klagen over'to complain about', oppassen voor'to look out for', iemand opwekken tot'to urge someone on to', iemand overhalen tot'to persuade someone to', iemand overtuigen van'to convince someone of', zich schamen over'to be ashamed of', twijfelen aan/over'to doubt of/to be in doubt about', uitkijken voor'to watch out for', waarschuwen voor'to warn against', zaniken/ zeuren over'to nag about', zorgen voor'to look after'
    [+]  VII.  Syntactic tests for distinguishing PP-complements and adverbial PPs

    The previous subsections have pointed out that PP-complements differ in various respects from adverbial PPs: the head of a PP-complement forms a semantic unit with the verb, is part of a restricted paradigm and cannot be dropped under pronominalization of the PP; the prepositional head of an adverbial PP, on the other hand, has independent meaning, is part of a paradigm and can be dropped if the PP is replaced by an adverb. This subsection discusses some additional syntactic tests that have been proposed to distinguish prepositional objects from adverbial PPs.

    [+]  A.  Position in the middle field of the clause

    Word order may also provide a clue as to the status of a PP. PP-complements are generated as part of the lexical projection of the verb, whereas adverbial PPs are generated as adjuncts, that is, external to the lexical projection of the verb. This is reflected in that PP-complements are normally closer to the verb in clause-final position than the adverbial PPs are (although PP-complements can, of course, precede the adverbial phrases if they are topicalized or wh-moved).

    318
    a. dat Jan [op het perron]adv [op zijn vader]compl wacht.
      that Jan  on the platform   for his father  waits
    a'. * dat Jan [op zijn vader]compl [op het perron]adv wacht.
    b. dat de communisten [tijdens WO II]adv [voor een betere wereld]compl ijverden.
      that the communists during WW II  for a better world  fought
    b'. * dat de communisten [voor een betere wereld] compl [tijdens WO II]adv ijverden.

    The fact that the PP-complements in (318) must follow the adverbial phrases of place/time can also be used to distinguish the two met-phrases in (297); whereas the comitative met-PP in the (a)-examples in (319) can readily precede the frequency adverb vaak'often', this gives rise to a marked and semantically incoherent result in the metaphorical (b)-examples, which may be construed as evidence in favor of complement status for the PP in the latter examples.

    319
    a. dat Jan vaak met zwaargewichten geworsteld heeft.
      that  Jan often  with heavyweights  wrestled  has
      'that Jan has often wrestled with his heavyweights.'
    a'. dat Jan met zwaargewichten vaak geworsteld heeft.
    b. $ dat Jan vaak met zijn computer/geweten geworsteld heeft.
      that  Jan often  with his computer/conscience  wrestled  has
      'that Jan is having difficulties with his computer/conscience.'
    b'. $ dat Jan met zijn computer/geweten vaak geworsteld heeft.
    [+]  B.  Pseudo-cleft sentences

    For some (but not all) speakers, PP-complements can be used in so-called pseudo-cleft sentences whereas adverbial PPs cannot; cf. Van den Toorn (1981:35). This is illustrated in (320). The judgments given on the examples in (320b'&d') only hold for the intended, locational reading of the PP.

    320
    a. Jan wacht op een uitnodiging voor het feest.
    PP-complement
      Jan waits  for an invitation for the party
    a'. Waarop Jan wacht is een uitnodiging voor het feest.
      for.what  Jan waits  is an invitation for the party
    b. Jan wacht op het perron.
    adverbial PP
      Jan waits  on the platform
    b'. * Waarop Jan wacht is het perron.
      on.what  Jan  waits  is the platform
    c. De communisten vochten voor een betere wereld.
    PP-complement
      the communists  fought  for a better world
    c'. Waarvoor de communisten vochten was een betere wereld.
      for.what  the communists  fought  was a better world
    d. De communisten vochten voor het gerechtsgebouw.
    adverbial PP
      the communists  fought  in.front.of the courthouse
    d'. * Waarvoor de communisten vochten was het gerechtsgebouw.
      in.front.of.what  the communists  fought  was the courthouse

    The two met-phrases in (297) seem to exhibit a similar contrast: whereas the comitative met-PP cannot readily be used in the cleft-construction, the PP-complement can. For those speakers that share these judgments, this can be used as an argument in favor of complement status for the PP in the metaphorical examples in (319b), and thus be construed as evidence in favor of complement status for the PPs in (297b).

    321
    a. % Waarmee Jan vaak worstelt zijn zwaargewichten.
      with.what  Jan often wrestles  are heavyweights
    b. Waarmee Jan worstelt is zijn computer/geweten.
      with.what  Jan wrestles is his computer/conscience
    [+]  C.  The adverbial .. en pronoun doet dat test

    Prepositional complements can also be distinguished from adverbially used PPs by means of the VP adverb test. When clauses with a PP can be paraphrased by means of an ... en pronoun doet dat PP clause, we are dealing with an adverbial PP. Clauses with PP-complements cannot be paraphrased in this way. The reason for the inability of PP-complements to appear in this clause is that the constituent doet dat refers to the verb phrase, that is, the verb and all of its complements; see Klooster (2001:144).

    322
    a. Marie wacht op haar vriend.
    PP-complement
      Marie waits  for her friend
      'Marie is waiting for her friend.'
    a'. * Marie wacht en zij doet dat op haar vriend.
      Marie waits  and  she  does  that  for her friend
    b. Marie wachtte op het station.
    PP-adjunct
      Marie waited  at the railway station
    b'. Marie wachtte en zij deed dat op het station.
      Marie waited  and  she  did  that  at the railway.station

    This test can again be used to distinguish the two met-phrases in (297); Whereas the comitative met-PP can readily be paraphrased by means of an ... en pronoun doet dat PP clause, the PP in the metaphorical example gives rise to a marked and semantically incoherent result.

    323
    a. Jan worstelt en hij doet dat met zijn buurman.
      Jan wrestles  and  he  does  that  with his neighbor
      'Jan is wrestling and he doing that with his neighbor.'
    b. $ Jan worstelt en hij doet dat met zijn computer/geweten.
      Jan wrestles  and  he does that  with his computer/conscience

          Vandeweghe & Colleman (2011) have claimed that the simpler paraphrase by means of the conjunct ... en wel PP may provide a similar result as the ... en pronoun doet dat PP paraphrase. According to us, however, this paraphrase is less suitable for our purpose given that it also gives rise to an acceptable result if the PP-complement is optional: the examples in (324) show that the primeless examples in (322) can both be paraphrased in this way.

    324
    a. % Marie wacht, en wel op haar vriend.
    optional PP-complement
      Marie wacht  en wel  for her friend
      'Marie is waiting, namely for her friend.'
    b. Marie wacht, en wel op het station.
    PP-adjunct
      Marie wacht en wel  at the station
      'Marie is waiting, at the station.'

    We marked example (324a) with a percentage sign because Vandeweghe & Colleman claim this example to be excluded, whereas Duinhoven (1989) assigns a similar example a question mark. To our ear, the ... en wel PP paraphrase is only excluded if the PP-complement is obligatory, as in (325). We therefore have to dismiss this as a test for distinguishing PP-complements from adverbial phrases.

    325
    a. Jan rekent #(op een complimentje).
    obligatory PP-complement
      Jan counts     on a compliment
      'Jan is expecting a compliment.'
    b. * Jan rekent en wel op een complimentje.
      Jan counts  and  wel  on a compliment

    The fact that we find this contrast between the examples in (324) and (325) is in fact consistent with Vandeweghe & Colleman's claim that the acceptability of the ... en wel PP phrase points out that the verb is also meaningful without the PP, which is clearly the case with the verb wachten'to wait' in (324a). This is not surprising given that a similar contrast to that shown in (325) can be found in examples such as (326), in which the PPs are given as afterthoughts.

    326
    a. Marie wachtte de hele dag — op haar vriend.
    optional PP-complement
      Marie waited  the whole day  for her friend
    b. Marie wachtte de hele dag — op het station.
    PP-adjunct
      Marie waited  the whole day  at the station
    c. * Jan rekende de hele dag — op een compliment.
    obligatory PP-complement
      Jan counted the whole day  on a compliment
      'Jan was expecting a compliment all day.'

    We do not agree with Vandeweghe & Colleman's claim, however, that the adverbial ... en pronoun doet dat test shows the same thing, given that examples such as (322a') are not only given as unacceptable by Klooster (2001), but also by Broekhuis (2004) and Schermer-Vermeer (2006). This does not mean that this test is without its problems; Schermer-Vermeer provides a small number of potential counterexamples involving the verbs zaniken/zeuren (over)'to nag (about)', schateren (om)'to roar with pleasure (about)' and protesteren tegen'protest against', in which a presumed PP-complement is part of an ... en pronoun doet dat clause; (327) provides one somewhat simplified example.

    327
    Hij piekert vaak en hij doet dat over de meest onbenullige dingen.
      he  worries  often  and  he  does  that  about the most silly things
    'He worries often and he does that about the silliest things.'

    Given that the adverbial ... en pronoun doet dat test does give relatively clear results in other cases, it remains to be seen what examples such as (327) really tell us: we may either conclude that the adverbial ... en pronoun doet dat test is not foolproof or that the PPs in question are in fact adverbial phrases. We leave this to future research.

    [+]  VIII.  Prepositional complements versus prepositional predicates

    Finally, we want to say something about the distinction between PP-complements and PPs that function as complementives. Although these predicative PPs can also be said to function as a complement of the verb, they are sufficiently different to not include them in this subsection. Here we will simply assume that PP-complements can be distinguished from PP-complementives by means of PP-over-V; the examples in (328) show that the former but not the latter can be placed after the verb in clause-final position. We refer the reader to Section P4.2 for an extensive discussion of the syntactic behavior of predicatively used PPs.

    328
    a. Jan heeft <naar een film> gekeken <naar een film >.
    PP-complement
      Jan has    at a film  looked
      'Jan has looked at a movie.'
    a'. Els is <naar Tilburg> gewandeld <*naar Tilburg >.
    complementive
      Els is   to Tilburg  walked
      'Els has walked to Tilburg.'
    b. Jan heeft een uur <op de trein> gewacht <op de trein>.
    PP-complement
      Jan has  an hour   for the train  waited
      'Jan has waited for the train for an hour.'
    b'. Jan heeft een uur <op het perron> gestaan <??op het perron>.
    complementive
      Jan has  an hour   on the platform stood
      'Jan has stood on the platform for an hour.'
    References:
    • Broekhuis, Hans2004Het voorzetselvoorwerpNederlandse Taalkunde997-131
    • Duinhoven, A.M1989Het voorzetselvoorwerp. Een zinspatroon in wordingDe Nieuwe Taalgids8240-45
    • Klooster, Wim2001Grammatica van het hedendaags Nederlands. Een volledig overzichtDen HaagSDU Uitgeverij
    • Klooster, Wim2001Grammatica van het hedendaags Nederlands. Een volledig overzichtDen HaagSDU Uitgeverij
    • Schermer-Vermeer, Ina2006Worstelen met het voorzetselvoorwerpNederlandse Taalkunde11146-167
    • Schermer-Vermeer, Ina2006Worstelen met het voorzetselvoorwerpNederlandse Taalkunde11146-167
    • Toorn, M.C. van den1981Nederlandse grammaticaGroningenWolters-Noordhoff: 7th, revised edition
    • Vandeweghe, Willy & Colleman, Timothy2011Drie-argumentstructuurconstructies met een voorzetselobjectVerslagen & Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde121205-228
    • Vandeweghe, Willy & Devos, Magda2003Relationele subtypen bij voorzetselobjectenLeuvense Bijdragen92103-114
    About this article
    Author(s): Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riet Vos
    Category: Dutch Syntax
    Keywords: AdverbComplementLexicalizationObjectPrepositional ObjectPronominalizationR-extractionR-pronominalizationWord Order
    Version: 1.0, January 2016
    Version history:
    version editor(s) date remarks
    1.0 Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riet Vos January 2016
    report errorprintcite
    Jump to:
    X